source_raw_snapshot
{
"id": "ec802093-a84d-4445-94ff-5b756cb5bb04",
"daily_ranking_item_id": "aca3bcab-0c66-4f94-9076-e1ecf1b11ad8",
"source": "hacker_news",
"external_id": "48276598",
"fetched_at": "2026-05-28T22:01:23.716Z",
"story_raw": {
"by": "rbanffy",
"id": 48276598,
"url": "https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/news-about-raspberry-pi-6-and-microcontroller-development/",
"kids": [
48281601,
48313511,
48313411,
48313163,
48313200,
48314159,
48313962,
48314543,
48313692,
48313333
],
"time": 1779782572,
"type": "story",
"score": 106,
"title": "News about Raspberry Pi 6 and Microcontroller Development",
"descendants": 79
},
"stats_raw": {
"time": 1779782572,
"score": 106,
"descendants": 79
},
"aux_raw": {
"external_url": "https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/news-about-raspberry-pi-6-and-microcontroller-development/",
"hn_comment_url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276598",
"normalized_text": null,
"external_article": {
"title": "News about Raspberry Pi 6 and Microcontroller Development",
"excerpt": "On Thursday, three of the lead Raspberry Pi engineers hosted an AMA on the r/engineering subreddit .\n\nOne of the most interesting tidbits was on the Pi 6.\n\nFollowing that cycle, one would expect a Pi 6 3-4 years after the Pi 5, which would put it in 2026 or 2027.\n\nMy guess is Pi 6 development is already pretty far along... but there's that pesky global DRAM shortage that makes this a bad time to launch a new computer. There's no sense in releasing an SBC that costs twice as much as the $50 Pi 5 .\n\nEben stretched the timeline a bit to 4-4.5 years, and indicated a Pi 6 wouldn't come before early 2028... which means the Pi 5 will remain Pi's flagship for a while.\n\nAnd if you're expecting a built-in M.2 slot or more ports, I'd temper your expectations: It sounds like the key feature will be 'more': a faster CPU and faster IO, rather than new features.\n\nAnd instead of wasting precious silicon with an NPU, Eben said they see the \"CPU as a venue for AI compute.\" So I don't expect any specific AI chip on the Pi 6.\n\nWhen asked about the Pi Zero 2W, Eben said the substrate supply is constrained—basically, so many AI chips are being made that even older chips using older process nodes have to",
"final_url": "https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/news-about-raspberry-pi-6-and-microcontroller-development/",
"fetched_at": "2026-05-28T22:01:17.738Z",
"description": "On Thursday, three of the lead Raspberry Pi engineers hosted an AMA on the r/engineering subreddit. Raspberry Pi 6 One of the most interesting tidbits was on the Pi 6. Looking back at previous launches: 2012: Raspberry Pi 2015: Raspberry Pi 2 (+3 years) 2016: Raspberry Pi 3 (+1 year) 2019: Raspberry Pi 4 (+3 years) 2023: Raspberry Pi 5 (+4 years) Following that cycle, one would expect a Pi 6 3-4 years after the Pi 5, which would put it in 2026 or 2027."
},
"selected_comments": [
{
"id": 48281601,
"raw": {
"by": "ThrowawayR2",
"id": 48281601,
"kids": [
48287628,
48312789,
48314971,
48314472,
48315189,
48312864,
48314688
],
"text": "> "<i>...: It sounds like the key feature will be 'more': a faster CPU and faster IO, rather than new features.</i>"<p>Raspberry Pi Holdings is a embedded systems manufacturer for pity's sake; we don't need more from them, we need less. [EDIT] A faster Raspberry Pi 6 is encroaching on the territory of the Intel N150 and its successors and mainstream Linux distributions and that is a battle they would lose in terms of price and performance.<p>Give us a Raspberry Pi Zero 3W with proper sleep states to reduce sleep power consumption, lower idle power while awake, and 1 GB of RAM even if it doubles the price.",
"time": 1779811445,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
"body": "> \" ...: It sounds like the key feature will be 'more': a faster CPU and faster IO, rather than new features. \" Raspberry Pi Holdings is a embedded systems manufacturer for pity's sake; we don't need more from them, we need less. [EDIT] A faster Raspberry Pi 6 is encroaching on the territory of the Intel N150 and its successors and mainstream Linux distributions and that is a battle they would lose in terms of price and performance. Give us a Raspberry Pi Zero 3W with proper sleep states to reduce sleep power consumption, lower idle power while awake, and 1 GB of RAM even if it doubles the price.",
"is_op": false,
"author": "ThrowawayR2",
"raw_body": "> "<i>...: It sounds like the key feature will be 'more': a faster CPU and faster IO, rather than new features.</i>"<p>Raspberry Pi Holdings is a embedded systems manufacturer for pity's sake; we don't need more from them, we need less. [EDIT] A faster Raspberry Pi 6 is encroaching on the territory of the Intel N150 and its successors and mainstream Linux distributions and that is a battle they would lose in terms of price and performance.<p>Give us a Raspberry Pi Zero 3W with proper sleep states to reduce sleep power consumption, lower idle power while awake, and 1 GB of RAM even if it doubles the price.",
"created_at": 1779811445,
"reply_count": 7
},
{
"id": 48313511,
"raw": {
"by": "dirtikiti",
"id": 48313511,
"kids": [
48315291,
48315505,
48313726,
48313937,
48313845,
48314230,
48313619
],
"text": "I have bought an rpi at every generation. And I still have yet to find an actual use for them.<p>Everything they do from a compute perspective is just better with a mini pc or old laptop with a mobile spec chip.<p>Everything they do from a programmability perspective is just better with a microcontroller specific to the task.<p>I just don't see the actual market position for these things. They were supposed to be a cheap board, but you can't actually buy them cheaply because the vendors upcharge so much.",
"time": 1779993605,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
"body": "I have bought an rpi at every generation. And I still have yet to find an actual use for them. Everything they do from a compute perspective is just better with a mini pc or old laptop with a mobile spec chip. Everything they do from a programmability perspective is just better with a microcontroller specific to the task. I just don't see the actual market position for these things. They were supposed to be a cheap board, but you can't actually buy them cheaply because the vendors upcharge so much.",
"is_op": false,
"author": "dirtikiti",
"raw_body": "I have bought an rpi at every generation. And I still have yet to find an actual use for them.<p>Everything they do from a compute perspective is just better with a mini pc or old laptop with a mobile spec chip.<p>Everything they do from a programmability perspective is just better with a microcontroller specific to the task.<p>I just don't see the actual market position for these things. They were supposed to be a cheap board, but you can't actually buy them cheaply because the vendors upcharge so much.",
"created_at": 1779993605,
"reply_count": 7
},
{
"id": 48313411,
"raw": {
"by": "porphyra",
"id": 48313411,
"kids": [
48313896,
48314802
],
"text": "The 8GB Pi 5, at $170 [1], is encroaching on Jetson Orin Nano Super's $240 price point [2]. But the Jetson has a faster CPU (newer a78ae cores rather than a76) and, obviously, a whole-ass GPU.<p>[1] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5</a><p>[2] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-orin-nano-super-developer-kit\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-ori...</a>",
"time": 1779993177,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
"body": "The 8GB Pi 5, at $170 [1], is encroaching on Jetson Orin Nano Super's $240 price point [2]. But the Jetson has a faster CPU (newer a78ae cores rather than a76) and, obviously, a whole-ass GPU. [1] https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5 [2] https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-ori...",
"is_op": false,
"author": "porphyra",
"raw_body": "The 8GB Pi 5, at $170 [1], is encroaching on Jetson Orin Nano Super's $240 price point [2]. But the Jetson has a faster CPU (newer a78ae cores rather than a76) and, obviously, a whole-ass GPU.<p>[1] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5</a><p>[2] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-orin-nano-super-developer-kit\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-ori...</a>",
"created_at": 1779993177,
"reply_count": 2
},
{
"id": 48313163,
"raw": {
"by": "peteforde",
"id": 48313163,
"kids": [
48313353,
48314161,
48314044
],
"text": "Pi's refusal to drop a USB-C on Pico due to cost increases is a terrible call IMO.<p>I seriously cannot fathom being someone doing development who wouldn't pay $0.50 extra to purge the last micro USB from their desktop.",
"time": 1779992240,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
"body": "Pi's refusal to drop a USB-C on Pico due to cost increases is a terrible call IMO. I seriously cannot fathom being someone doing development who wouldn't pay $0.50 extra to purge the last micro USB from their desktop.",
"is_op": false,
"author": "peteforde",
"raw_body": "Pi's refusal to drop a USB-C on Pico due to cost increases is a terrible call IMO.<p>I seriously cannot fathom being someone doing development who wouldn't pay $0.50 extra to purge the last micro USB from their desktop.",
"created_at": 1779992240,
"reply_count": 3
},
{
"id": 48313200,
"raw": {
"by": "bradfa",
"id": 48313200,
"kids": [
48313659
],
"text": "Would love to see actual security focused hardware/software features, like full OP-TEE, fTPM (or a more ideally a real physical TPM), and similar. For example, so that the OTP isn't the only way to store a disk encryption unlock key.<p>The existing secure boot mechanisms aren't bad, but allowing for more than one public key hash in OTP would be nice, too.<p>These kinds of things are expected to be on modern embedded SOCs and SOMs now.",
"time": 1779992373,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
"body": "Would love to see actual security focused hardware/software features, like full OP-TEE, fTPM (or a more ideally a real physical TPM), and similar. For example, so that the OTP isn't the only way to store a disk encryption unlock key. The existing secure boot mechanisms aren't bad, but allowing for more than one public key hash in OTP would be nice, too. These kinds of things are expected to be on modern embedded SOCs and SOMs now.",
"is_op": false,
"author": "bradfa",
"raw_body": "Would love to see actual security focused hardware/software features, like full OP-TEE, fTPM (or a more ideally a real physical TPM), and similar. For example, so that the OTP isn't the only way to store a disk encryption unlock key.<p>The existing secure boot mechanisms aren't bad, but allowing for more than one public key hash in OTP would be nice, too.<p>These kinds of things are expected to be on modern embedded SOCs and SOMs now.",
"created_at": 1779992373,
"reply_count": 1
}
],
"presentation_fields": {
"title": "News about Raspberry Pi 6 and Microcontroller Development",
"tagline": "www.jeffgeerling.com",
"website_url": "https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/news-about-raspberry-pi-6-and-microcontroller-development/",
"canonical_url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276598"
},
"external_url_hostname": "www.jeffgeerling.com",
"selected_comments_raw": [
{
"by": "ThrowawayR2",
"id": 48281601,
"kids": [
48287628,
48312789,
48314971,
48314472,
48315189,
48312864,
48314688
],
"text": "> "<i>...: It sounds like the key feature will be 'more': a faster CPU and faster IO, rather than new features.</i>"<p>Raspberry Pi Holdings is a embedded systems manufacturer for pity's sake; we don't need more from them, we need less. [EDIT] A faster Raspberry Pi 6 is encroaching on the territory of the Intel N150 and its successors and mainstream Linux distributions and that is a battle they would lose in terms of price and performance.<p>Give us a Raspberry Pi Zero 3W with proper sleep states to reduce sleep power consumption, lower idle power while awake, and 1 GB of RAM even if it doubles the price.",
"time": 1779811445,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
{
"by": "dirtikiti",
"id": 48313511,
"kids": [
48315291,
48315505,
48313726,
48313937,
48313845,
48314230,
48313619
],
"text": "I have bought an rpi at every generation. And I still have yet to find an actual use for them.<p>Everything they do from a compute perspective is just better with a mini pc or old laptop with a mobile spec chip.<p>Everything they do from a programmability perspective is just better with a microcontroller specific to the task.<p>I just don't see the actual market position for these things. They were supposed to be a cheap board, but you can't actually buy them cheaply because the vendors upcharge so much.",
"time": 1779993605,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
{
"by": "porphyra",
"id": 48313411,
"kids": [
48313896,
48314802
],
"text": "The 8GB Pi 5, at $170 [1], is encroaching on Jetson Orin Nano Super's $240 price point [2]. But the Jetson has a faster CPU (newer a78ae cores rather than a76) and, obviously, a whole-ass GPU.<p>[1] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/673711/raspberry-pi-5</a><p>[2] <a href=\"https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-orin-nano-super-developer-kit\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-ori...</a>",
"time": 1779993177,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
{
"by": "peteforde",
"id": 48313163,
"kids": [
48313353,
48314161,
48314044
],
"text": "Pi's refusal to drop a USB-C on Pico due to cost increases is a terrible call IMO.<p>I seriously cannot fathom being someone doing development who wouldn't pay $0.50 extra to purge the last micro USB from their desktop.",
"time": 1779992240,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
},
{
"by": "bradfa",
"id": 48313200,
"kids": [
48313659
],
"text": "Would love to see actual security focused hardware/software features, like full OP-TEE, fTPM (or a more ideally a real physical TPM), and similar. For example, so that the OTP isn't the only way to store a disk encryption unlock key.<p>The existing secure boot mechanisms aren't bad, but allowing for more than one public key hash in OTP would be nice, too.<p>These kinds of things are expected to be on modern embedded SOCs and SOMs now.",
"time": 1779992373,
"type": "comment",
"parent": 48276598
}
]
},
"selection_meta": {
"discussion_depth": "top_comments_v1",
"external_article": {
"status": "ok",
"final_url": "https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/news-about-raspberry-pi-6-and-microcontroller-development/",
"status_code": 200,
"content_type": "text/html",
"failure_reason": null
},
"snapshot_version": "hn_story_v3",
"selected_comments_count": 5,
"external_article_resolved": true,
"text_normalization_applied": false
},
"created_at": "2026-05-28T22:01:23.937Z",
"updated_at": "2026-05-28T22:01:23.937Z"
}